Torts Law Chapter - Annual Survey 2009 Out of Stock
Quantity
Title: 2009 Annual Survey of Law
Chapter: Torts Law
Chapter: Torts Law
Author: John W. Grund
Format: Print On-Demand
The 2009 Annual Survey of Law is written by top lawyers in their fields and covers many of the most critical areas of Colorado law and practice. The Annual Survey is an important resource to stay current with legal updates and trends.
CBA CLE now has available for immediate download, individual chapters and programs from our 2009 Annual Survey of Colorado Law and for many of the chapters in three different formats:
- Print On-Demand - Available for all chapters
- Video On-Demand - See list for which chapters are available in this format. Each chapter is available for 1 CLE Credit!
- MP3 Download - See list for which chapters are available in this format Each chapter is available for 1 CLE Credit!
We have taken several of our Annual Survey chapters and brought them to life: The authors of several Annual Survey chapters have been captured on tape and present their specific topic in a format that is available for Video On-Demand or MP3 On-Demand - These two formats are available for 1 CLE Credit!
Get the chapter or program specific to what you need and your area of law. The Annual Survey of Colorado Law is one of our most valued and best-selling books that provides Colorado practitioners with:
- Comprehensive updates on new case law
- Legislative Updates from 2009
- Administrative Updates from 2009
- Regulatory developments from 2009
The 2009 Annual Survey of Colorado Law is a Books in Action CBA CLE Program
CBA CLE is more than CLE credit: we are an educational resource providing legal practitioners with knowledge and legal research on your terms- 24/7.
CBA-CLE - Your Connection to Colorado Law
If anything characterized the appellate courts’ decisions in the area of torts in 2009, it was probably the variety of subjects. Outside of its decision in Union
Pacific R.R. v. Martin, 209 P.3d 185 (Colo. 2009), the supreme court did not issue any tort opinions that either surprised or altered the landscape. Even Martin
was expected by many observers, though it was an important decision to stabilize premises-liability law for the Bench and trial bar, because that is a frequently litigated area of negligence law. Other than that, variety was more the central theme, with cases concerning several torts that are not seen on a regular basis, such as dram-shop liability, abuse of process, and defamation.
Additionally, one court of appeals case is somewhat intriguing, if only because the Colorado Supreme Court has granted certiorari; thus, it will likely be 2010 or
2011 before we receive the final word on whether a private entity’s employee may be considered a co-employee of a governmental entity for purposes of the Governmental Immunity Act damages cap, see Henisse v. First Transit, Inc., 220 P.3d 980 (Colo. App. 2009), cert. granted, 2009 Colo. LEXIS 1201 (Dec. 14, 2009). And it surprised no one that the supreme court decided to review Blood v. Qwest Services Corp., 2009 Colo. App. LEXIS 716 (April 30, 2009), cert. denied in part and granted in part, 2010 Colo. LEXIS 155 (Feb. 22, 2010), given the amount at issue and the constitutional questions raised concerning the punitive damages award.
- CLE Pass Price *FREE! - exclusions may apply
- Standard Price $8.95 USD
- Member Price $4.95 USD
- General Credits
- Ethics Credits
- EDI Credits