CLE Legal Connection http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/?p=39836 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~3/ooW21vgoNx4/ Job Satisfaction career transition economics inspiration job satisfaction mental health Archeconomics I made up the term “archeconomics.” I’m using “arch” in the sense of “first principles” — e.g., as in “archetype.” An “arch” is the larger version of the smaller expressions of itself — e.g., not just a villain but an arch-villain, not just an angel but an archangel. Life goes big when an arch-something is at work: experience expands beyond circumstance, meaning magnifies, significance is exaggerated. Thu, 18 Oct 2018 14:25:31 Z https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/archeconomics/#respond Kevin Rhodes <div class="pf-content"><p><a href="http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/archeconomics/archangel/" rel="attachment wp-att-39837"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-39837" src="http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/archangel.jpg" alt="" width="236" height="335" srcset="https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/archangel.jpg 236w, https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/archangel-106x150.jpg 106w, https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/archangel-211x300.jpg 211w" sizes="(max-width: 236px) 100vw, 236px" /></a>I made up the term “archeconomics.” I’m using “arch” in the sense of “first principles” — <em>e.g</em>., as in “archetype.” An “arch” is the larger version of the smaller expressions of itself — <em>e.g</em>., not just a villain but an arch-villain, not just an angel but an archangel. Life goes big when an arch-something is at work: experience expands beyond circumstance, meaning magnifies, significance is exaggerated.</p> <p>Archeconomics is therefore the larger story behind economics.</p> <p>I ended last week’s post by referring to the larger story behind the rentier economy. As usually happens when I’m on a research trail, several commentaries have appeared in my various feeds lately that look beyond the usual opinionated mash of current events and instead address over-arching ideas and issues. All of them deal in one way or another with the current status and possible future of the liberal worldview — an arch-topic if there ever was one.</p> <p>The term “liberal” in this context doesn’t refer to <em>political</em> liberal vs. conservative, but rather to historical liberalism, which among other things gave us post-WWII neo-liberal economics. Mega-bestselling author Yuval Noah Harari describes this kind of liberalism in his latest book <em><a href="https://www.penguin.co.uk/articles/2017/5-things-to-know-about-21-lessons/">21 Lessons for the 21st Century</a></em>:</p> <blockquote><p>In Western political discourse the term “liberal” is sometimes used today in a much narrower sense, to denote those who support specific causes such as gay marriage, gun control, and abortion rights. Yet most so-called conservatives also embrace the broad liberal worldview.</p> <p>The liberal story cherishes human liberty as its number one value. It argues that all authority ultimately stems from the free will of individual humans, as expressed in their feelings, desires, and choices. In politics, liberalism believes that the voter knows best. It therefore upholds democratic elections. In economics, liberalism maintains that the customer is always right. It therefore hails free-market principles. In personal matters, liberalism encourages people to listen to themselves, be true to themselves, and allow their hearts — as long as they do not infringe on the liberties of others. This personal freedom is enshrined in human rights.</p></blockquote> <p>If you read Harari’s books <em><a href="https://www.ynharari.com/book/sapiens/">Sapiens</a></em> and <em><a href="https://www.ynharari.com/book/homo-deus/">Homo Deus</a></em>. you have a sense of what you’ll find in <em>21 Lessons</em>, but I found it worth reading on its own terms. Two recent special magazine editions also take on the fate of liberalism: &#8220;<a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/projects/is-democracy-dying/">Is Democracy Dying?</a><em>”</em> from <em>The Atlantic </em>and<em> “</em><a href="https://www.economist.com/leaders/2018/09/13/a-manifesto-for-renewing-liberalism?">A Manifesto for Renewing Liberalism</a>” from <em>The Economist. </em>The titles speak for themselves, and both are offered by publications with nearly two centuries of liberal editorial perspectives.</p> <p>Another historical liberal offering from a conservative political point of view is “<a href="http://time.com/5421576/donald-trump-trumpism/?">How Trumpism Will Outlast Trump</a>,” from <em>Time Magazine</em>. Here’s the article’s précis:</p> <blockquote><p>These intellectuals are committed to a new economic nationalism . . . They’re looking past Trump . . . to assert a fundamental truth: whatever you think of him, Donald Trump has shown a major failing in the way America’s political parties have been serving their constituents. The future of Trump’s revolution may depend on whether this young group can help fix the economy.</p></blockquote> <p>Finally, here’s a trio of offerings that invoke environmental economics — the impact of the global ecology on global economics being another archeconomics topic. The first is a <a href="http://ipcc.ch/report/sr15/">scientific study</a> published last week that predicted significant environmental degradation within a surprisingly short time. Second is an article about the study that wants to know “<a href="http://time.com/5418690/why-ignore-climate-change-warnings-un-report/?">Why We Keep Ignoring Even the Most Dire Climate Change Warnings</a>.” Third is last week’s announcement that the <a href="https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/10/meet-the-winners-of-this-years-nobel-prize-for-economics/">winner of this year’s Nobel Prize in Economics</a> is an environmental economist.</p> <p>Some or all of those titles should satisfy if you’re in the mood for some arch-reading.</p> <p>Next time, we’ll return to plain old economics, with a look at how the low income social strata is faring in all the dust-up over rentiers and economic inequality, robotcs and machine learning, and the sagging paycheck going to human labor.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <div style="border: 1px solid #999999; background-color: #dadada;"> <p><em><a href="http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2017/07/can-money-buy-happiness/photo-kevin-head-shot-thumbnail/" rel="attachment wp-att-37377"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-37377" src="http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Photo-Kevin-Head-Shot-thumbnail.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="187" srcset="https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Photo-Kevin-Head-Shot-thumbnail.jpg 150w, https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Photo-Kevin-Head-Shot-thumbnail-120x150.jpg 120w" sizes="(max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px" /></a></em></p> <p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevin-rhodes-b171117/">Kevin Rhodes</a> studies and writes about economics in an effort to understand the world his kids are growing up in, which is also the world he’s growing old in. You might enjoy his latest LinkedIn Pulse article &#8220;<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fame-monster-rockstars-rockstar-entrepreneurs-kevin-rhodes/">The Fame Monster: Rockstars And Rockstar Entrepreneurs</a>.&#8221;</p> </div> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~4/ooW21vgoNx4" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/archeconomics/feed/ 0 https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/archeconomics/ 2018-10-18 14:25 +00:00 2018-10-18 08:25 -06:00 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/?p=39831 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~3/QwfcJMEAA3M/ Case Law 10th Circuit Tenth Circuit: Unpublished Opinions, 10/17/2018 On Wednesday, October 16, 2018, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals issued no published opinion and three unpublished opinions. Thu, 18 Oct 2018 14:08:32 Z https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-10-17-2018/#respond Susan Hoyt <div class="pf-content"><p>On Wednesday, October 17, 2018, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals issued no published opinion and three unpublished opinions.</p> <p><a href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/18/18-2056.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>CNSP, Inc. v. City of Santa Fe</em></a></p> <p><em><a href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/18/18-2138.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">United States v. Sanchez-Rivas</a></em></p> <p><a href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/17/17-3247.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>In re Garcia: Davis v. Tyson Prepared Foods, Inc.</em></a></p> <p>Case summaries are not provided for unpublished opinions. However, some published opinions are <a href="https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/tag/10th-circuit/">summarized and provided by Legal Connection</a>.</p> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~4/QwfcJMEAA3M" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-10-17-2018/feed/ 0 https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-10-17-2018/ 2018-10-18 14:08 +00:00 2018-10-18 08:08 -06:00 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/?p=39829 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~3/exLFhSuslic/ Case Law Colorado Supreme Court criminal law drug-sniffing dog evidence interlocutory appeal probable cause suppression warrantless search Colorado Supreme Court: Totality of Circumstances, Including Drug Dog’s Alert, Provided Probable Cause for Car Search The Colorado Supreme Court issued its opinion in <em>People v. Bailey</em> on Monday, October 15, 2018. Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:42:52 Z https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/colorado-supreme-court-totality-of-circumstances-including-drug-dogs-alert-provided-probable-cause-for-car-search/#respond CBA-CLE Staff <div class="pf-content"><p>The Colorado Supreme Court issued its opinion in <a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2018/18SA169.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>People v. Bailey</em></a> on Monday, October 15, 2018.</p> <blockquote><p><em>Searches and Seizures—Probable Cause—Search Without Warrant—Odor Detection—Use of Dogs.</em></p> <p>In this interlocutory appeal, the supreme court considered whether the trial court erred in ruling that state troopers lacked probable cause to search defendant’s car when they placed Mason, a narcotics-detecting dog, inside the car to sniff around. The court held that the totality of the circumstances, including Mason’s alert to the odor of narcotics while sniffing the exterior of defendant’s car, provided the troopers with probable cause to search the car. The fact that Mason’s alert was not a final indication did not render it irrelevant to the troopers’ probable cause determination. Therefore, the court reversed the trial court’s order suppressing evidence collected by the troopers during a subsequent hand search of the car.</p></blockquote> <p><em>Summary provided courtesy of </em><a href="https://www.cobar.org/-em-Colorado-Lawyer-em" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Colorado Lawyer</a>.</p> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~4/exLFhSuslic" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/colorado-supreme-court-totality-of-circumstances-including-drug-dogs-alert-provided-probable-cause-for-car-search/feed/ 0 https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/colorado-supreme-court-totality-of-circumstances-including-drug-dogs-alert-provided-probable-cause-for-car-search/ 2018-10-17 15:42 +00:00 2018-10-17 09:42 -06:00 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/?p=39827 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~3/xwS7iZ5y9-Q/ Case Law Colorado Supreme Court criminal law jury instructions self-defense Colorado Supreme Court: Unique Facts of Case Permit Use of Self-Defense Instruction for Robbery of Taxi Services The Colorado Supreme Court issued its opinion in <em>People v. DeGreat</em> on Monday, October 15, 2018. Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:31:47 Z https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/colorado-supreme-court-unique-facts-of-case-permit-use-of-self-defense-instruction-for-robbery-of-taxi-services/#respond CBA-CLE Staff <div class="pf-content"><p>The Colorado Supreme Court issued its opinion in <a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2015/15SC754.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>People v. DeGreat</em></a> on Monday, October 15, 2018.</p> <blockquote><p><em>Self-Defense—Aggravated Robbery—Jury Instructions—Affirmative Defenses. </em></p> <p>This case required the supreme court to decide whether a division of the court of appeals erred in concluding that the statutory right to self-defense can apply to justify a defendant’s robbery of taxi cab services. On the unique facts presented, the court concluded that the division correctly determined that defendant was entitled to a self-defense instruction as to the aggravated robbery charge, although the court’s reasoning differed from that on which the division relied. The court concluded that defendant presented some credible evidence to allow a reasonable jury to conclude that the robbery of services that he allegedly committed was committed in self-defense. Accordingly, the court affirmed the division’s judgment, albeit based on different reasoning.</p></blockquote> <p><em>Summary provided courtesy of </em><a href="https://www.cobar.org/-em-Colorado-Lawyer-em" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Colorado Lawyer</a>.</p> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~4/xwS7iZ5y9-Q" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/colorado-supreme-court-unique-facts-of-case-permit-use-of-self-defense-instruction-for-robbery-of-taxi-services/feed/ 0 https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/colorado-supreme-court-unique-facts-of-case-permit-use-of-self-defense-instruction-for-robbery-of-taxi-services/ 2018-10-17 15:31 +00:00 2018-10-17 09:31 -06:00 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/?p=39825 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~3/xEiQl80Fpow/ Case Law 10th Circuit Tenth Circuit: Unpublished Opinions, 10/16/2018 On Tuesday, October 16, 2018, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals issued two published opinions and four unpublished opinions. Wed, 17 Oct 2018 15:26:47 Z https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-10-16-2018/#respond Susan Hoyt <div class="pf-content"><p>On Tuesday, October 16, 2018, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals issued two published opinions and four unpublished opinions.</p> <p><a href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/17/17-4167.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Rahimi v. Sweat</em></a></p> <p><a href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/17/17-8097.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>United States v. Martinez</em></a></p> <p><a href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/18/18-3083.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>United States v. Foy</em></a></p> <p><a href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/18/18-1270.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Lamar v. O&#8217;Dell</em></a></p> <p>Case summaries are not provided for unpublished opinions. However, some published opinions are <a href="https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/tag/10th-circuit/">summarized and provided by Legal Connection</a>.</p> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~4/xEiQl80Fpow" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-10-16-2018/feed/ 0 https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-10-16-2018/ 2018-10-17 15:26 +00:00 2018-10-17 09:26 -06:00 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/?p=39823 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~3/XtOlftBaXEY/ Case Law Colorado Supreme Court competency criminal law evidence physician-patient privilege privilege psychologist-patient privilege Colorado Supreme Court: Competency Records of Other Defendant in Related Case were Protected by Privilege The Colorado Supreme Court issued its opinion in <em>Zapata v. People</em> on Monday, October 15, 2018. Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:50:04 Z https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/colorado-supreme-court-competency-records-of-other-defendant-in-related-case-were-protected-by-privilege/#respond CBA-CLE Staff <div class="pf-content"><p>The Colorado Supreme Court issued its opinion in <a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2016/16SC552.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Zapata v. People</em></a> on Monday, October 15, 2018.</p> <blockquote><p><em>Physician-Patient Privilege—Psychologist-Client Privilege—Competency Evaluations—Res Gestae.</em></p> <p>In this case, the trial court declined to give defendant access to, or to review in camera, competency reports regarding another defendant in a factually related but separate case. Over objection, the trial court also admitted uncharged misconduct evidence as res gestae.</p> <p>The supreme court held that competency reports are protected by the physician-patient or psychologist-client privilege and that the examinee did not waive the privilege as to defendant when he put his competency in dispute in his own case. The court also held that defendant’s confrontation right was not implicated and that defendant did not make a sufficient showing that the competency reports contained exculpatory evidence to justify their release to him or review by the trial court pursuant to due process or Crim. P. 16.</p> <p>The court further held that any error in admitting the uncharged misconduct evidence as res gestae was harmless given the strong evidence of defendant’s guilt.</p> <p>Accordingly, the court of appeals’ judgment was affirmed.</p></blockquote> <p><em>Summary provided courtesy of </em><a href="https://www.cobar.org/-em-Colorado-Lawyer-em" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Colorado Lawyer</a>.</p> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~4/XtOlftBaXEY" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/colorado-supreme-court-competency-records-of-other-defendant-in-related-case-were-protected-by-privilege/feed/ 0 https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/colorado-supreme-court-competency-records-of-other-defendant-in-related-case-were-protected-by-privilege/ 2018-10-16 14:50 +00:00 2018-10-16 08:50 -06:00 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/?p=39821 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~3/cAyn6RBeRBc/ Case Law business law collections law Colorado Fair Debt Collections Practices Act Colorado Supreme Court Fair Debt Collections Act insurance law litigation tort law Colorado Supreme Court: Tort Cannot Be Transaction Giving Rise to Obligation to Pay Money, Therefore Not Debt Per Fair Debt Collection Practices Act The Colorado Supreme Court issued its opinion in <em>Ybarra v. Greenberg &#038; Sada, P.C.</em> on Monday, October 15, 2018. Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:43:57 Z https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/colorado-supreme-court-tort-cannot-be-transaction-giving-rise-to-obligation-to-pay-money-therefore-not-debt-per-fair-debt-collection-practices-act/#respond CBA-CLE Staff <div class="pf-content"><p>The Colorado Supreme Court issued its opinion in <a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2016/16SC721.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Ybarra v. Greenberg &amp; Sada, P.C.</em></a> on Monday, October 15, 2018.</p> <blockquote><p><em>Finance, Banking, and Credit—Insurance—Statutory Interpretation—Torts.</em></p> <p>Ybarra petitioned for review of the court of appeals’ judgment affirming the dismissal of her Colorado Fair Debt Collection Practices Act action against Greenberg &amp; Sada, P.C. The district court dismissed for failure to state a claim, finding that damages arising from a subrogated tort claim do not qualify as a debt within the contemplation of the Act. The court of appeals agreed, reasoning that the undefined term “transaction” in the Act’s definition of “debt,” required some kind of business dealing, as distinguished from the commission of a tort; and to the extent an insurance contract providing for the subrogation of the rights of an insured constitutes a transaction in and of itself, that transaction is not one obligating the debtor to pay money, as required by the Act.</p> <p>The supreme court held that because a tort does not obligate the tortfeasor to pay damages, a tort cannot be a transaction giving rise to an obligation to pay money, and is therefore not a debt within contemplation of the Act; and because an insurance contract providing for the subrogation of the rights of a damaged insured is not a transaction giving rise to an obligation of the tortfeasor to pay money, it also cannot constitute a transaction creating a debt within contemplation of the Act.</p> <p>Accordingly, the court of appeals’ judgment was affirmed.</p></blockquote> <p><em>Summary provided courtesy of </em><a href="https://www.cobar.org/-em-Colorado-Lawyer-em" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Colorado Lawyer</a>.</p> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~4/cAyn6RBeRBc" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/colorado-supreme-court-tort-cannot-be-transaction-giving-rise-to-obligation-to-pay-money-therefore-not-debt-per-fair-debt-collection-practices-act/feed/ 0 https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/colorado-supreme-court-tort-cannot-be-transaction-giving-rise-to-obligation-to-pay-money-therefore-not-debt-per-fair-debt-collection-practices-act/ 2018-10-16 14:43 +00:00 2018-10-16 08:43 -06:00 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/?p=39819 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~3/OeFrAdR0GEw/ Case Law 10th Circuit Tenth Circuit: Unpublished Opinions, 10/15/2018 On Monday, October 15, 2018, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals issued no published opinion and four unpublished opinions. Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:36:12 Z https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-10-15-2018/#respond Susan Hoyt <div class="pf-content"><p>On Monday, October 15, 2018, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals issued no published opinion and four unpublished opinions.</p> <p><a href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/18/18-3084.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>United States v. Powell</em></a></p> <p><a href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/18/18-6153.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Thompson v. Bryant</em></a></p> <p><a href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/18/18-5048.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>United States v. Wells</em></a></p> <p><a href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/17/17-4201.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>United States v. Mitchell</em></a></p> <p>Case summaries are not provided for unpublished opinions. However, some published opinions are <a href="https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/tag/10th-circuit/">summarized and provided by Legal Connection</a>.</p> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~4/OeFrAdR0GEw" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-10-15-2018/feed/ 0 https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-10-15-2018/ 2018-10-16 14:36 +00:00 2018-10-16 08:36 -06:00 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/?p=39816 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~3/0uuo8iVvVnk/ Case Law Colorado Supreme Court Colorado Supreme Court: Announcement Sheet, 10/15/2018 On Monday, October 15, 2018, the Colorado Supreme Court issued four published opinions. Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:28:38 Z https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/colorado-supreme-court-announcement-sheet-10-15-2018/#respond Susan Hoyt <div class="pf-content"><p>On Monday, October 15, 2018, the Colorado Supreme Court issued four published opinions.</p> <p><a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2016/16SC721.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Ybarra v. Greenberg &amp; Sada, P.C.</em></a></p> <p><a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2016/16SC552.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Zapata v. People</em></a></p> <p><a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2015/15SC754.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>People v. DeGreat</em></a></p> <p><a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2018/18SA169.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>People v. Bailey</em></a></p> <p>Summaries of these cases are forthcoming.</p> <p>Neither State Judicial nor the Colorado Bar Association provides case summaries for unpublished appellate opinions. The case announcement sheet is <a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/Courts/Supreme_Court/Case_Announcements/Files/2018/5F7BDD10.15.18.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">available here</a>.</p> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~4/0uuo8iVvVnk" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/colorado-supreme-court-announcement-sheet-10-15-2018/feed/ 0 https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/colorado-supreme-court-announcement-sheet-10-15-2018/ 2018-10-15 15:28 +00:00 2018-10-15 09:28 -06:00 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/?p=39814 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~3/cSiVGluHK58/ Case Law 10th Circuit Tenth Circuit: Unpublished Opinions, 10/12/2018 On Friday, October 12, 2018, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals issued no published opinion and four unpublished opinions. Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:27:26 Z https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-10-12-2018/#respond Susan Hoyt <div class="pf-content"><p>On Friday, October 12, 2018, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals issued no published opinion and four unpublished opinions.</p> <p><em><a class="rss-item" href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/18/18-1236.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">United States v. Holyfield</a></em></p> <p><em><a class="rss-item" href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/18/18-5088.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">United States v. Perryman</a></em></p> <p><em><a class="rss-item" href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/18/18-3034.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Heffington v. Puleo</a></em></p> <p><em><a class="rss-item" href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/18/18-1287.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">DeWild v. Raemisch</a></em></p> <p>Case summaries are not provided for unpublished opinions. However, some published opinions are <a href="https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/tag/10th-circuit/">summarized and provided by Legal Connection</a>.</p> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~4/cSiVGluHK58" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-10-12-2018/feed/ 0 https://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/10/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-10-12-2018/ 2018-10-15 14:27 +00:00 2018-10-15 08:27 -06:00