CLE Legal Connection http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/?p=39233 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~3/RIXdy4GW9u8/ Case Law Colorado Supreme Court declaratory judgment energy law government law municipal law utilities Colorado Supreme Court: Respondents’ Complaint Asserted Timely Claim Seeking Declaration that Ordinance Violated City Charter The Colorado Supreme Court issued its opinion in <em>City of Boulder v. Public Service Co. of Colorado</em> on Monday, June 18, 2018. Wed, 20 Jun 2018 23:07:25 Z http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/colorado-supreme-court-respondents-complaint-asserted-timely-claim-seeking-declaration-that-ordinance-violated-city-charter/#respond CBA-CLE Staff <div class="pf-content"><p>The Colorado Supreme Court issued its opinion in <a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2016/16SC894.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>City of Boulder v. Public Service Co. of Colorado</em></a> on Monday, June 18, 2018.</p> <blockquote><p><em>Declaratory Judgment Actions—C.R.C.P. 57—C.R.C.P. 106—Municipal Ordinances—Finality.</em></p> <p>This case arises out of respondents’ challenge to petitioner city’s attempt to create a light and power utility. Respondents assert that the ordinance establishing the utility violates the city’s charter. Respondents thus seek a declaratory judgment deeming that ordinance null and void. The city asserted that respondents’ complaint was, in reality, an untimely C.R.C.P. 106 challenge to a prior ordinance by which the city had concluded that it could meet certain prerequisites for the formation of the utility as prescribed by the city charter. The district court agreed with the city and dismissed respondents’ complaint for lack of jurisdiction. A division of the court of appeals, however, vacated the district court’s judgment, concluding that neither of the pertinent ordinances was final and therefore respondents’ complaint was premature.</p> <p>The supreme court reversed the division’s decision and remanded the case for further proceedings on respondents’ declaratory judgment claim. Although the court agreed with the city that the division erred, contrary to petitioners’ position and the premises on which the courts below proceeded, the court agreed with respondents that the complaint asserted a viable and timely claim seeking a declaration that the ordinance establishing the utility violated the city charter. Accordingly, the court concluded that the district court had jurisdiction to hear respondents’ declaratory judgment claim, and the court remanded the case to allow that claim to proceed.</p></blockquote> <p><em>Summary provided courtesy of </em><a href="http://www.cobar.org/-em-Colorado-Lawyer-em" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Colorado Lawyer</a>.</p> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~4/RIXdy4GW9u8" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/colorado-supreme-court-respondents-complaint-asserted-timely-claim-seeking-declaration-that-ordinance-violated-city-charter/feed/ 0 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/colorado-supreme-court-respondents-complaint-asserted-timely-claim-seeking-declaration-that-ordinance-violated-city-charter/ 2018-06-20 23:07 +00:00 2018-06-20 17:07 -06:00 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/?p=39235 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~3/MgnbC8b-BTs/ Case Law C.A.R. 21 child abuse Colorado Supreme Court criminal law interlocutory appeal pattern of abuse remand sexual assault Colorado Supreme Court: Jury’s Refusal to Convict on Pattern of Abuse Charge Does Not Necessitate Retrial on Only Single Act The Colorado Supreme Court issued its opinion in <em>In re People v. Stackhouse</em> on Monday, June 18, 2018. Wed, 20 Jun 2018 23:07:09 Z http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/colorado-supreme-court-jurys-refusal-to-convict-on-pattern-of-abuse-charge-does-not-necessitate-retrial-on-only-single-act/#respond CBA-CLE Staff <div class="pf-content"><p>The Colorado Supreme Court issued its opinion in <a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2018/18SA26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>In re People v. Stackhouse</em></a> on Monday, June 18, 2018.</p> <blockquote><p><em>Double Jeopardy.</em></p> <p>Pursuant to C.A.R. 21, the People challenged a district court order granting Stackhouse’s motion to compel the People to elect a particular allegation of sexual assault on a child as their sole basis for proceeding in Stackhouse’s retrial. The supreme court held that the district court erred when it concluded that the jury in Stackhouse’s first trial had necessarily concluded that he did not commit multiple acts of assault, and therefore that he could not be retried for more than a single assault. The court made the rule to show cause absolute, reversed the district court’s order, and remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings.</p></blockquote> <p><em>Summary provided courtesy of </em><a href="http://www.cobar.org/-em-Colorado-Lawyer-em" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Colorado Lawyer</a>.</p> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~4/MgnbC8b-BTs" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/colorado-supreme-court-jurys-refusal-to-convict-on-pattern-of-abuse-charge-does-not-necessitate-retrial-on-only-single-act/feed/ 0 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/colorado-supreme-court-jurys-refusal-to-convict-on-pattern-of-abuse-charge-does-not-necessitate-retrial-on-only-single-act/ 2018-06-20 23:07 +00:00 2018-06-20 17:07 -06:00 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/?p=39237 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~3/F_FOsbKimmY/ Case Law 10th Circuit Tenth Circuit: Unpublished Opinions, 6/20/2018 On Wednesday, June 20, 2018, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals issued no published opinion and four unpublished opinions. Wed, 20 Jun 2018 23:06:55 Z http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-6-20-2018/#respond Susan Hoyt <div class="pf-content"><p>On Wednesday, June 20, 2018, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals issued no published opinion and four unpublished opinions.</p> <p><em><a href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/17/17-1358.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Brooks v. Gabriel</a></em></p> <p><a href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/17/17-7062.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Allen v. Lang</em></a></p> <p><a href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/17/17-7061.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Burnett v. Miller</em></a></p> <p><a href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/17/17-1396.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Mielnicki v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.</em></a></p> <p>Case summaries are not provided for unpublished opinions. However, some published opinions are <a href="http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/tag/10th-circuit/">summarized and provided by Legal Connection</a>.</p> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~4/F_FOsbKimmY" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-6-20-2018/feed/ 0 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-6-20-2018/ 2018-06-20 23:06 +00:00 2018-06-20 17:06 -06:00 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/?p=39228 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~3/OaEuzLtQQ3A/ Updates 4th Judicial District court appointments El Paso County judge appointments Hon. Stephen J. Sletta and Hon. Regina Walter to Retire from El Paso County Court On Thursday, June 15, 2018, the Colorado State Judicial Branch announced the retirement of Hon. Stephen J. Sletta and Hon. Regina Walter. Both judges sit on the El Paso County Court, and their retirements will be effective on January 7, 2019.  Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:46:35 Z http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/hon-stephen-j-sletta-and-hon-regina-walter-to-retire-from-el-paso-county-court/#respond Susan Hoyt <div class="pf-content"><p>On Thursday, June 15, 2018, the Colorado State Judicial Branch announced the retirement of Hon. Stephen J. Sletta and Hon. Regina Walter. Both judges sit on the El Paso County Court, and their retirements will be effective on January 7, 2019.</p> <p><a href="http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/hon-stephen-j-sletta-and-hon-regina-walter-to-retire-from-el-paso-county-court/judge-sletta-small/" rel="attachment wp-att-39229"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-39229" src="http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/judge-sletta-small-241x300.jpg" alt="" width="241" height="300" srcset="http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/judge-sletta-small-241x300.jpg 241w, http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/judge-sletta-small-121x150.jpg 121w, http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/judge-sletta-small.jpg 243w" sizes="(max-width: 241px) 100vw, 241px" /></a>Judge Sletta was appointed to the El Paso County Court in 1991. He mostly presides over a docket of civil cases, including traffic violations and misdemeanor charges. Prior to his appointment to the bench, he was in private practice for 15 years. He received his undergraduate degree from Colorado College and his law degree from the University of Colorado School of Law.</p> <p><a href="http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/hon-stephen-j-sletta-and-hon-regina-walter-to-retire-from-el-paso-county-court/attachment/0/" rel="attachment wp-att-39230"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-39230" src="http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/0.jpeg" alt="" width="200" height="200" srcset="http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/0.jpeg 200w, http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/0-150x150.jpeg 150w, http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/0-70x70.jpeg 70w, http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/0-100x100.jpeg 100w" sizes="(max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px" /></a>Judge Walter was appointed to the El Paso County Court in August 2008. Prior to her appointment, she was an El Paso County Court magistrate for 21 years, working in the juvenile court. She was also a deputy public defender prior to her appointment as a magistrate. She received her undergraduate degree from Colorado College and her law degree from the University of Tulsa College of Law.</p> <p>Applications are now being accepted for both upcoming vacancies. Eligible applicants must be qualified electors of El Paso County and must have been admitted to practice law in Colorado for five years. Application forms are available on the State Judicial website or from Justice Carlos A. Samour, Jr., the <em>ex officio</em> chair of the Fourth Judicial District Nominating Commission. Applications must be received no later than 4 p.m. on July 23, 2018; anyone wishing to nominate another must do so no later than July 16, 2018.</p> <p>For more information about the vacancies, <a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/Careers/Judge_Opportunities/Announcements/JD04%20-%20Sletta%20and%20Walter%20vacancies%20FINAL2.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">click here</a>.</p> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~4/OaEuzLtQQ3A" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/hon-stephen-j-sletta-and-hon-regina-walter-to-retire-from-el-paso-county-court/feed/ 0 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/hon-stephen-j-sletta-and-hon-regina-walter-to-retire-from-el-paso-county-court/ 2018-06-20 15:46 +00:00 2018-06-20 09:46 -06:00 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/?p=39226 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~3/eI9s5JYCLMQ/ Case Law attorney fees Colorado Supreme Court foreign judgments litigation trust & estate law trust administration trust and estate law Colorado Supreme Court: Colorado Court Lacks Jurisdiction to Award Attorney Fees for Foreign Action The Colorado Supreme Court issued its opinion in <em>Roberts v. Bruce</em> on Monday, June 18, 2018. Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:22:39 Z http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/colorado-supreme-court-colorado-court-lacks-jurisdiction-to-award-attorney-fees-for-foreign-action/#respond CBA-CLE Staff <div class="pf-content"><p>The Colorado Supreme Court issued its opinion in <a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2017/17SC55.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Roberts v. Bruce</em></a> on Monday, June 18, 2018.</p> <blockquote><p><em>Attorney Fees—Statutory Interpretation. </em></p> <p>In this case, the supreme court considered whether a trial court may award attorney fees under C.R.S. § 13-17-102 for conduct occurring outside Colorado courts. Reviewing the plain language of 13-17-102, the court concluded that an award of attorney fees pursuant to that section is limited to conduct occurring in Colorado courts and therefore affirmed the judgment of the court of appeals.</p></blockquote> <p><em>Summary provided courtesy of </em><a href="http://www.cobar.org/-em-Colorado-Lawyer-em" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Colorado Lawyer</a>.</p> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~4/eI9s5JYCLMQ" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/colorado-supreme-court-colorado-court-lacks-jurisdiction-to-award-attorney-fees-for-foreign-action/feed/ 0 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/colorado-supreme-court-colorado-court-lacks-jurisdiction-to-award-attorney-fees-for-foreign-action/ 2018-06-20 15:22 +00:00 2018-06-20 09:22 -06:00 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/?p=39224 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~3/OWXdxS0YwCs/ Case Law Colorado Common Interest Community Act Colorado Supreme Court common interest community HOA law real estate law Colorado Supreme Court: Foundational Documents Insufficient to Create Homeowners Association for Common Land The Colorado Supreme Court issued its opinion in <em>McMullin v. Hauer</em> on Monday, June 18, 2018. Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:19:21 Z http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/colorado-supreme-court-foundational-documents-insufficient-to-create-homeowners-association-for-common-land/#respond CBA-CLE Staff <div class="pf-content"><p>The Colorado Supreme Court issued its opinion in <a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2015/15SC701.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>McMullin v. Hauer</em></a> on Monday, June 18, 2018.</p> <blockquote><p><em>Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act—Common Interest Communities—Homeowners’ Associations.</em></p> <p>The supreme court reviewed the court of appeals’ opinion affirming the trial court’s order finding that the recorded instruments in this case were sufficient to create both a common interest community by implication and an unincorporated homeowners’ association. The court held that the recorded instruments were insufficient under the Colorado Community Interest Ownership Act to create a common interest community by implication. Accordingly, the court reversed the court of appeals’ judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.</p></blockquote> <p><em>Summary provided courtesy of </em><a href="http://www.cobar.org/-em-Colorado-Lawyer-em" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Colorado Lawyer</a>.</p> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~4/OWXdxS0YwCs" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/colorado-supreme-court-foundational-documents-insufficient-to-create-homeowners-association-for-common-land/feed/ 0 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/colorado-supreme-court-foundational-documents-insufficient-to-create-homeowners-association-for-common-land/ 2018-06-20 15:19 +00:00 2018-06-20 09:19 -06:00 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/?p=39222 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~3/EV3T2Td4rkM/ Case Law actual damages anticipated loss breach of contract Colorado Supreme Court contract law litigation Colorado Supreme Court: District Court Erred in Requiring Party to Settle for Anticipated Loss Because That Would Require Giving Up Contractual Rights The Colorado Supreme Court issued its opinion in <em>United States Welding, Inc. v. Advanced Circuits, Inc.</em> on Monday, June 18, 2018. Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:13:04 Z http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/colorado-supreme-court-district-court-erred-in-requiring-party-to-settle-for-anticipated-loss-because-that-would-require-giving-up-contractual-rights/#respond CBA-CLE Staff <div class="pf-content"><p>The Colorado Supreme Court issued its opinion in <a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2016/16SC365.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>United States Welding, Inc. v. Advanced Circuits, Inc.</em></a> on Monday, June 18, 2018.</p> <blockquote><p><em>Breach of Contract—Mitigation—Settlement Offer—Accord and Satisfaction. </em></p> <p>U.S. Welding, Inc. (Welding) sought review of the court of appeals’ judgment affirming the district court’s order awarding it no damages whatsoever for breach of contract with Advanced Circuits, Inc. (Advanced). Notwithstanding its determination following a bench trial that Advanced breached its contract to purchase from Welding all its nitrogen requirements during a one-year term, the district court reasoned that by declining Advanced’s request for an estimate of lost profits expected to result from Advanced’s breach before the contract term expired, Welding failed to mitigate.</p> <p>The supreme court reversed the court of appeals’ judgment concerning the failure to mitigate and remanded the case for further proceedings. The court held that the district court erred by requiring Welding to settle for a projection of anticipated lost profits, rather than its actual loss, as measured by the amount of nitrogen Advanced actually purchased from another vendor over the contract term, because an aggrieved party is not obligated to mitigate damages from a breach by giving up its rights under the contract.</p></blockquote> <p><em>Summary provided courtesy of </em><a href="http://www.cobar.org/-em-Colorado-Lawyer-em" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Colorado Lawyer</a>.</p> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~4/EV3T2Td4rkM" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/colorado-supreme-court-district-court-erred-in-requiring-party-to-settle-for-anticipated-loss-because-that-would-require-giving-up-contractual-rights/feed/ 0 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/colorado-supreme-court-district-court-erred-in-requiring-party-to-settle-for-anticipated-loss-because-that-would-require-giving-up-contractual-rights/ 2018-06-20 15:13 +00:00 2018-06-20 09:13 -06:00 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/?p=39220 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~3/RrG7rKFGu5c/ Case Law 10th Circuit Tenth Circuit: Unpublished Opinions, 6/19/2018 On Tuesday, June 19, 2018, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals issued four published opinions and two unpublished opinions. Wed, 20 Jun 2018 15:07:38 Z http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-6-19-2018/#respond Susan Hoyt <div class="pf-content"><p>On Tuesday, June 19, 2018, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals issued four published opinions and two unpublished opinions.</p> <p><a href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/17/17-1340.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Cole v. City of Aurora</em></a></p> <p><a href="https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/opinions/17/17-1200.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>UET RR, LLC v. Comis</em></a></p> <p>Case summaries are not provided for unpublished opinions. However, some published opinions are <a href="http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/tag/10th-circuit/">summarized and provided by Legal Connection</a>.</p> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~4/RrG7rKFGu5c" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-6-19-2018/feed/ 0 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-6-19-2018/ 2018-06-20 15:07 +00:00 2018-06-20 09:07 -06:00 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/?p=39218 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~3/XnpzHEk2r3Q/ Case Law Colorado Supreme Court Colorado Supreme Court: Announcement Sheet, 6/18/2018 On Monday, June 18, 2018, the Colorado Supreme Court issued five published opinions. Tue, 19 Jun 2018 15:03:54 Z http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/colorado-supreme-court-announcement-sheet-6-18-2018/#respond Susan Hoyt <div class="pf-content"><p>On Monday, June 18, 2018, the Colorado Supreme Court issued five published opinions.</p> <p><a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2016/16SC365.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>United States Welding, Inc. v. Advanced Circuits, Inc.</em></a></p> <p><a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2015/15SC701.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>McMullin v. Hauer</em></a></p> <p><a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2017/17SC55.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Roberts v. Bruce</em></a></p> <p><a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2016/16SC894.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>City of Boulder v. Public Service Co. of Colorado</em></a></p> <p><a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2018/18SA26.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>People v. Stackhouse</em></a></p> <p>Summaries of these cases are forthcoming.</p> <p>Neither State Judicial nor the Colorado Bar Association provides case summaries for unpublished appellate opinions. The case announcement sheet is <a href="https://www.courts.state.co.us/Courts/Supreme_Court/Case_Announcements/Files/2018/53734D6.18.18.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">available here</a>.</p> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~4/XnpzHEk2r3Q" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/colorado-supreme-court-announcement-sheet-6-18-2018/feed/ 0 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/colorado-supreme-court-announcement-sheet-6-18-2018/ 2018-06-19 15:03 +00:00 2018-06-19 09:03 -06:00 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/?p=39216 http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~3/5K9spwcOGCQ/ Case Law 10th Circuit Tenth Circuit: Unpublished Opinions, 6/18/2018 On Monday, June 18, 2018, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals issued one published opinion and no unpublished opinions. Tue, 19 Jun 2018 14:58:40 Z http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-6-18-2018/#respond Susan Hoyt <div class="pf-content"><p>On Monday, June 18, 2018, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals issued one published opinion and no unpublished opinions.</p> <p>Case summaries are not provided for unpublished opinions. However, some published opinions are <a href="http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/tag/10th-circuit/">summarized and provided by Legal Connection</a>.</p> </div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/CBACLELegalConnection/~4/5K9spwcOGCQ" height="1" width="1" alt=""/> http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-6-18-2018/feed/ 0 http://cbaclelegalconnection.com/2018/06/tenth-circuit-unpublished-opinions-6-18-2018/ 2018-06-19 14:58 +00:00 2018-06-19 08:58 -06:00